|
2012:
Is It True?
Published on 01/13/06 at 13:23:14
EST
by: Whitley Strieber
Just
in the past two years, there have been two great
earthquakes that have devastated populated areas
and many other smaller ones that have also done
great damage, the Amazon has virtually dried
up, the Arctic has begun to melt, the Greenland
and Antarctic ice caps have become unstable,
and the weather has turned into a complex monster.
What is so interesting about this is that our planet is not the only one in
the solar system that appears to be affected. There have been signs of unusual
weather on Saturn, and Mars appears to be experiencing polar cap decline not
dissimilar to our own.
Now a scientific paper has been published suggesting
that increased solar activity over the past decade
has resulted in the sun contributing anywhere
from ten to thirty percent of the additional
heat that's going into global warming.
In fact, it doesn't just suggest this, it goes
a long way toward proving it. This will be taken
by some people to mean that we needn't bother
about global warming because it's the sun's fault.
But, of course, it's not ALL the sun's fault
and we can and must do something about the part
that's our fault. The truth is that the added
impact of solar heating makes the problem incredibly
urgent. This planet's whole natural process is
about to go into chaos, and when it does potentially
billions of us are going to die, and the most
vulnerable areas are the United States, Europe
and China, so we Americans cannot expect to sit
on the sidelines while the rest of the world
suffers for our sins.
Anybody who doesn't burn to do something about
the global warming problem is insane, and leaders
who won't address it are in the process right
now of committing the greatest crime against
humanity that history has ever known.
When I worked on Superstorm, there were no models
that factored in increased heating from the sun.
But it's there all right, and therein lies the
making of a catastrophe not unlike that prophesied
as the end of the age, according to Jose Arguelles,
by Pacal Votan, a Mayan ruler of the sixth century
A.D.
I am beginning to see around me evidence that
this man's prophecy was correct. Why that would
be so is another matter entirely, and one that
I cannot address except with speculation, but
I can say that, if things keep deteriorating
at the present rate, there are going to be environmental
disasters of unprecedented ferocity in a few
years, and I would not be surprised if they weren't
upon us right around 2012.
There is no question at all that an age is coming
to its end right now. In the past couple of years,
the problems have become so obvious that they
are very hard to ignore. The sun is more active
than it has been in a thousand years. The magnetic
pole is showing signs of a shift. Storms are
becoming more frequent and catastrophic. Human
pressure on the planet's natural functioning
is rapidly overwhelming its ability to stay alive.
Earth is dying.
And then there are the earthquakes and the subtle
suggestions that great volcanic events might
be impending. There are things nobody really
understands, such as the hot spot east of Santa
Barbara, California, and the signs of activity
beneath some of the world's supervolcanoes.
The earthquakes are the strangest phenomenon.
Why are they happening now? Are they in some
way related to solar activity? If so, it's not
something that our own science understands. We
even have trouble understanding if there is a
connection between earthquakes that take place
in close time proximity but on unrelated faults.
There was a book published some years ago called
Hamlet's Mill that suggested that much ancient
symbolism was an attempt to warn the far future
that earth every so often, perhaps on a regular
cycle of about 12,500 years, went into a state
of chaos.
Subsequent to the publication of this book,
we have come to know that there was a complex
series of cataclysms on this planet around 12,500
years ago, that led to the collapse of the world's
then extensive glaciation and the beginning of
the interglacial in which we have spent our entire
recorded history.
There is all sort of evidence, commented upon
by many authors, notably Rand and Rose Flem-Ath
and Graham Hancock, to the effect that some sort
of past civilization, advanced in ways that are
hard for us to apprehend, was utterly destroyed
during this time.
Sea levels rose fantastically during the glacial
melt, and they rose fast, increasing hundreds
of feet over just a few centuries. Nowadays,
we live in what would have been the highlands
of that period. Gigantic stretches of land that
were present in those days now are gone. And
there are suggestions, here and there, that there
might be inundated cities and other structures,
now far from land. But underwater archaeology
is in its infancy, and geology has not produced
more than a rough idea of where shorlines lay
during the last glaciation. Add to that the probability
that earthquakes have further altered landforms,
and the chances of proveably detecting any unquestionable
remains of even quite a large civilization become
remote.
Nevertheless, in memory and in prophecy, we
do have indications that this civilization was
once there, and that it has tried to send warning
forward.
We are living in the time it identified as the
next age of chaos, and we would do well to acknowledge
that fact as they did in their time, in order
to do what they did, which is to project some
remnant of what we have accomplished and what
wisdom we have gained forward into the next human
age.
It is fair to ask, then, what is to be done?
I'm not a survivalist and I'm not going to recommend
the purchase of flashlights and seeds. Time and
chance will capture us all, and it will be a
matter of luck and the moving finger on the wall
who survives and who does not.
Best that we humbly acknowledge that, somehow,
the past had possession of extremely potent knowledge.
It's demonstrable: Mayan texts do identify 2012
as an epochal year; and the environment is disintegrating
in ways that suggest that this prediction, made
over a thousand years ago by a man who didn't
even have use of the wheel, is perhaps the most
potent human idea formed in all of our history.
If he is correct, then it's not difficult to
argue that his was the best mind that ever lived,
at least during this particular cycle.
For nearly three million years, earth has been
rocked by climactic instability. The periodic
nature of ice ages suggests that the sun heats
up over a vast cycle of thousands of years, causing
the release of greenhouse gasses through natural
means, resulting in a spike in air temperature
that violently melts the ice and ushers in another
interglacial when the sun suddenly changes and
cools down again.
This gigantic solar cycle must exist now, but
it has not always existed. Actually, the earth
has spent huge, unimaginably long epochs in a
condition of stability unlike anything we have
known across the entire history of our development.
During many of these periods, there were no polar
caps, and life evolved slowly, impelled by the
competition for living space into the myriad
of forms and survival strategies that we see
around us today.
For the past three million years, though, the
opposite has been true. The continuous cycle
of cooling and heating that the planet is now
undergoing has wrought havoc in nature. The number
of species has been in decline for that entire
period, and has just now reached the peak of
the bell curve. We will see a phenomenal dieoff
in the next few years, a massive collapse in
the number of life forms on the planet.
The extinction event that created us, in other
words, is about to challenge our very existence.
It's not as if it hasn't happened before. In
fact, every time there was a gigantic climate
change, the primates reacted by adapting themselves
anew to changed conditions. Were it not for the
instability of the present situation, we would
never have become an intelligent species.
Now, that intelligence must be called upon again,
to get us through to the next period of relative
calm. During this period, we will leave behind
virtually everything we now understand as civilization.
The consumer society will be the first to go,
a victim of overpopulation and our failure to
address the need to find new energy sources early
enough. With it will go the United States as
superpower. We are already in the last phases
of that: like the British Empire in 1910, our
country is overwhelmed with debt and beginning
to treat the restless in its client states with
extraordinary brutality. Next will be some cataclysm,
perhaps the unexpected collapse of Saudi oil
or the detonation of atomic bombs in our cites
or a great plague--who knows what it will be--but
on the other side of it, the world will no longer
be dominated by a superpower.
At the same time and consequent to the fall
of the superpower, will come a period of climate
change so rapid that growing seasons worldwide
will be disrupted at the same time that the large
scale movement of food around the planet becomes
problematic due to a lack of energy resources.
This is likely to mean sickness and famine on
a very broad scale, especially in areas that
are not self sufficient in food.
It's not a pretty picture, and the failure of
human leadership worldwide just at the time when
creative innovation at the top was most essential
has condemned us to vast suffering.
So, why don't I just go ahead and fall on my
sword or put a gun to my head?
Because I am optimistic about the future, and
I have good reason to be.
At the same time that all of these negative
forces are gathering and arraying themselves
against us like some kind of dark army of invincible
soldiers with the monstrous weapons of the apocalypse,
all aimed straight at our hearts, the mind of
man is responding in ways that are so far beyond
what we presently realize that they beggar description.
However, we are on a collision course with two
destinies: the planet is about to throw us off
like a horse switching its tail at a persisten
dobson fly, while at the same time we are on
the point of making a series of phenomenal scientific
breakthroughs that may finally take the mind
in the direction it has been trying to go ever
since we looked up and saw the stars, which is
outside of the body, into the surrounding world
and universe, into total knowledge, total freedom
and a future so fantastic that what we will be
in fifty years will be so radically different
from what we are now that we will be all but
unrecognizable to ourselves.
If we live.
This has happened before. During the latter
stages of the dinosaur age, the climate entered
an unstable phase as well, which lasted about
three million years before a the great cataclysm
that delivered the coup de grace. During this
time, the number of dinosaur species gradually
declined, and highly intelligent--by dinosaur
standards--new species such as Struthomimus--evolved.
This fast, smart little beast came about as a
response to a consistently challenging climate.
In modern (by geologic standards) times, the
mammals responded to our own climate challenge
by evolving another highly intelligent species--us.
But we're a much better contender than Stuthomimus,
and for a very specfic reason: we are intelligent
enough and informed enough to induce further,
even more rapid evolution in ourselves, and perhaps
save ourselves and even our civilization, from
the coming upheaval.
Indeed, I don't believe that a changing environment
is actually our greatest enemy. Our greatest
enemy is a part of nature that lies concealed
within us. It is the death wish that arises out
of excessive population pressure. This death
wish began to be triggered a long time ago, in
the middle of the eighteenth century, when a
restlessness swept europe as cities grew in population,
crowding and filthiness. By the middle of the
nineteenth century, there had been two major
revolutions, the French in the 1780s and the
upheaval of the 1840s. In the United States in
the 1860s, the first war of population destruction
was fought. And then, at the beginning of the
twentieth century, the firing of a single bullet
into the brain of an archduke in Bosnia turned
on a killing machine that we had invented in
the form of the European arms race that had unfolded
from 1890 through 1914.
That killing machine, started by that single
bullet, has never since been turned off. It is
directly responsible for the rise of communism
and Naziism and the massive avalanche of death
that they brought to this world. Indeed, I could
take you, event by event, from that bullet to
the latest death in Iraq and show you just how
direct and unbroken that chain really is.
I could take you, also, through the wicked hell
of opposing ideologies that keep the machine
running, and show you how a larger sense of enmity,
expressed again and again as a desire to enter
one utopian condition or another, has been threatening
man from within even as the environment threatens
us from without.
But this is not a history lesson. It is about
what lies ahead, because the machinery of death
might at last coming to pieces, and, if it does,
then the human mind is going to spring free,
and there will be wonders.
A confluence of scientific discoveries holds
almost immeasurable promise for us. We are in
the position, probably for the first time in
any of the cycles we have lived through, of taking
possession of our own evolution, and therefore
also of the nature that now controls our lives
with its dangers, its arbitrary cycles, and its
indifferent casting of species after species
down into death.
Biological and informational technologies are
about to come together in ways that are beyond
startling, that suggest that we may finally leap
free of the bondage of the death wish and all
the silly superstitions and ideologies that flow
out of it, from the myth of the good communist
to the myth of the superman to the myth of the
free market, to leave it all behind, and along
with it the religious and social superstitions
that drive our ideologies on the ash-heap of
failed ideas and false gods.
As our ability to create ever more dense information
nodes is increasing exponentially, so also is
our ability to deliver information to the brain,
and to alter ourselves in ways that enable us
to process it with greater efficiency.
And this is only one of many areas in which
science is progressing toward the exact sort
of post-apocalyptic human state that has been
prophesied, that we will reach superconciousness
even as the world falls apart around us.
It turns out that our approaching this state
isn't connected with some sort of magic at all,
any more than the spirit hole through which Pacal
Votan said that he would speak was woven of an
incomprehensible magic. Just as ordinary science
is going to make the magic of the superconscious
human being a reality, it was that hole that
enabled archaeologists to discover Pacal Votan's
tomb, and bring his existence back to light.
Magic, when you understand it, is no longer
magic, and we are rapidly reaching the ideal
human condition, which is one in which the average
person is too smart to believe in the deadly
superstitions and ideologies that claw at us
like evil trolls trying to prevent us from fulfilling
our destiny, which is to take flight and fill
the universe with human mind, human spirit and
human being.
If we live...
Source:
http://www.unknowncountry.com/journal/?id=199
|